May 15th, 2012 at 8:03AM

timw4mail

Seems about right… http://bit.ly/L2Ypi3 http://bit.ly/J6br30

May 15th, 2012 at 6:48AM

timw4mail

@philsturgeon Isn’t that Apache in disguise?

May 14th, 2012 at 5:56PM

timw4mail

RT @codinghorror: time for a little code refactoring! http://t.co/8orhJyCg

May 14th, 2012 at 3:49PM

timw4mail

@grmpyprogrammer Generally I’d agree they are bad, but there are a few valid use cases.

May 14th, 2012 at 3:48PM

timw4mail

@grmpyprogrammer I don’t think so, because it’s clear where it is coming from. I’d say use of the extract() construct is generally worse.

May 14th, 2012 at 1:40PM

timw4mail

@philsturgeon It’s not an ORM, but a re-implementation of CI’s db class:
http://bit.ly/xb1rMf

May 14th, 2012 at 12:21PM

timw4mail

@meyerweb Yeah, you’re doing something weird.

May 14th, 2012 at 11:50AM

timw4mail

@meyerweb There’s a better way to do it? :P

May 14th, 2012 at 9:51AM

timw4mail

@rem Last I knew, it was free for a subdomain they provide.

May 14th, 2012 at 9:35AM

timw4mail

@philsturgeon Yeah…I think the old icons were better.